1Chen Li-Yu, 1Huang Ya-Ting ,2Fan Yu-Ming.
- 1 Primo Biotechnology Co., Ltd , Taipei, Taiwan.
- 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan..
Published by the 2025 65th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM).
Purpose: To assess the cost-utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging versus other diagnostic tools.
Procedure: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were conducted using studies published up to Oct 25, 2022 Incremental net benefit (INB) was estimated under a standardized cost framework using QALYs, life expectancy, and diagnostic accuracy.
Result: FDG imaging showed generally positive INBs, indicating favorable cost-effectiveness compared with most alternatives. CT-guided aspiration (CTG) had slightly higher INB due to its direct histological confirmation. In SUCRA ranking, CTG (0.685) and FDG (0.679) ranked highest. Integrated modalities like PET/CT had better cost-utility than PET or CT alone.
Conclusion: FDG imaging is a cost-effective diagnostic strategy, supporting its use in clinical decision-making.
